Rush is Wrong

Rush is Wrong!

I must begin by stating that I have been and still am a fan of Rush Limbaugh. I listen as often as I can and Rush still provides helpful insights into the political realm. However, I and many others cannot abide by his new affiliation with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). This allegiance has alienated the millions of gun owners and hunters who have faithfully supported this radio icon. For clarification, HSUS operates NO shelters for animals. It is an anti hunting lobbying group playing on its perceived affiliation with the local Humane Societies and animal shelters nationwide. The HSUS opposes all hunting and ultimately would like to end the hunting tradition in America.
So why does Rush endorse a group that is directly opposed to a large part of his audience? There are two plausible scenarios. In the first, perhaps Rush truly opposes hunting and underestimated or ignored the backlash. He is, after all, an animal lover as the frequent mention of his cat “Pumpkin” will attest to. The second is that Rush was misled, or made the convenient but erroneous connection with local or state Humane Societies which do such an enormous service with often heartbreaking choices concerning abandoned animals and which no one could oppose. I tend to believe the latter.
As a listener since the late 1980’s I have noticed the drastic difference in the Rush of today. Not to sound like one of the main stream media attacks, but he does seem to be out of touch with the common man. Even during the time of his painkiller addiction and the rehab triumph he still seemed as sharp on the show as usual. Now however, a critical week of tuning in may reveal a sad truth. He seems to be trapped in a bubble of celebrity golf outings and dinners along with his near isolation of his Florida compound. Though he does give speeches to large crowds, how much actual interaction is there? Traveling in his own orbit, he takes any trifling criticism as an attack on him personally. Any event scheduled from noon to three is somehow connected to his show. Even in his patter, which many of us can recite verbatim with him it is evident that something is amiss.
His well rehearsed and delivered rants often still include Peter Jennings and Dan Rather as relevant broadcast media members. Sadly, the ability to follow the salient point of the callers to his show cannot go unnoticed. Though his now frequent misunderstanding of callers may be explainable by his hearing loss, it cannot explain his trouble with misunderstanding events or headlines. Recently Rush believed a British headline referred to President Obama as a mutt. He even read the headline aloud which cited Obama as “the owner of The First Mutt”. It took several minutes before he realized his error. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. I know some will attack me for taking this “one” mistake and insinuating the loss of mental acuity. So be it. Before you do though, listen and I mean really listen to Rush. Not with the ear of a fan or someone listening to an old friend recount a favorite story, but with the ear of someone listening to Rush for the first time. With one week’s critical listening, you too may discover that a beloved radio icon has started down the long road to pasture.

Obamanomics: The Curly Doctrine

Obamanomics: The Curly Doctrine

One of my favorite Three Stooges episodes involves the stooges in a boat that springs a leak. While Larry and Moe attempt to bail out the water and plug the hole, Curly spies a hand powered auger-style drill. With perfect childlike logic he says “ Oh! A water-letter-outer” and commences to drill holes in the bottom of the boat to let the water out with the obvious result. His theory, as illogical as it is, makes some sense if all knowledge of fluid dynamics, physics and even common sense are ignored. Holes can be used to drain water and many holes can drain even faster. Which brings us to the Curly Doctrine now being employed to solve our economic issues by President Obama.
Though he tries to keep it to himself, President Obama vaguely hints that he may have ‘inherited” the current economic situation from his predecessor George W. Bush. Well… alright he says it a lot and seems quite convinced. Though the economy was in a down turn before the election, the fact is the Dow has lost 3,000 points and dropping since Obama was elected. So what is his answer: SPEND! That always worked for me. Every time I find myself out of money, a mad spending spree always balances my checkbook.
Obamanomics will grow government, nationalize banks, extend the welfare state, implement national healthcare, raise taxes on everyone capable of employing others, and pay for it with crippling taxes and by printing money, which guarantees astronomical inflation in a couple of years. Each one of these is another hole drilled through the bottom of our boat which is quickly becoming the USS Sieve. Though there are instances of corporate greed and excess, all CEOs are not the evil robber barons opposed by the original “Progressives”. Our corporate tax rate remains one of the highest in the world, driving many corporations and jobs overseas. But rather than take steps to alleviate the situation, President Obama decries the private jets, limos, and lavish business junkets. All of which incidentally create jobs. Any CEO who drives anything bigger than a moped covered with sheet metal is pilloried as evil incarnate. So junkets are cancelled, private jet orders dwindle etc.
While this augering of America (pun intended) continues where is the backlash? Anyone who criticizes or is guilty of merely mentioning an alterative is either “following the failed policies of the past” or playing politics. While the Bush administration left a leaky ship, the Curly Doctrine of President Obama is exacerbating the situation. Despite the current Bear Surge of the stock market this week, the overall direction is down. Man the life boats!

The Resurrection of George W. Bush

George W. Bush has the previously unimaginable opportunity to achieve the most amazing resurrection since Lazarus. The Democrats in Congress are flailing for an answer to the current gas crisis which in large part is due to the constrictions that they have placed on oil companies. The environmentalists have had their willing lackeys in Congress place so much red tape on any and all attempts to create or expand domestic energy that it would require executive orders to reverse. Whether the question is offshore oil, offshore natural gas, coal to oil, oil from shale or nuclear power the answer is always the same: litigation from the environmentalists to make the process so expensive and time consuming that energy companies look elsewhere. Is anyone surprised that we now import 70% of our oil and haven’t built a nuclear plant in decades. Even with plans on the table for getting some of these projects towards production, the legal hurdles ensure that relief is nowhere in sight.
So how does Bush pull a Lazarus? Well first let’s look at what is not news anymore. The war in Iraq must be going better than expected at this point. The proof? It has all but vanished from the lips of every talking head on network news and only sees the light in newsprint after the foreclosure notices. The surge has been a success and President Bush is even hinting of a troop withdrawals ahead of expectations. How much credit can Congress take when they have said they support the troops in the same breath as they tried to implement their “slow bleed” policy to leave our soldiers twisting in the wind? The answer is none. What else is not daily news is President Bush’s approval rate. Why not? Could it be because the Congressional approval rate has now hit single digits? How can you condemn as unpopular someone whose approval rate is nearly 700% higher than yours?
Bush has little time left in office to begin to build a legacy. Like a boxer who has taken an early beating but comes on strong in later rounds can steal a decision, it is still possible. After Hurricane Katrina, President Bush allowed refineries freedom from the custom ,state by state, special blend they are forced to make in order to fill demand. He could do it again to bring supply up. Though he has been loathe to wield executive power in this manner, the nation needs it. He could also use the airwaves as Ronald Reagan did to rally people to pressure Congress to act quickly to approve domestic production of all our recourses on an accelerated pace.
The Democrats in Congress are once again on the opposite side an issue with the majority of Americans due to their slavish allegiance to the extreme left. The more of a spotlight the President can focus on Congressional ineptitude, the more people will rally to the cause. The majority of Americans favor domestic drilling, oppose losing the Iraq war, oppose the proposed national 55 mile per hour speed limit, oppose illegal immigration, … the list is long and these are all platforms of Conservatism. Though Bush is certainly no rock ribbed Conservative by any stretch of the imagination, he could use our ideals to mitigate or turn back the perceived Democratic successes in November. In doing so, he would emerge from the tomb that has encased him since the “Mission Accomplished” debacle.

Sally Field: Sister Bertrille or Sister Betrayal?

Sister Bertrille or Sister Betrayal? Sally Field has become the latest celebrity to dive off the list of people I thought I knew. After watching people portray certain characters, you begin to identify them with that role and form opinions about them on that basis. I have been a fan of Sally Field from the Flying Nun days, through the Smokey and the Bandit days right up until the current medicinal ads. I have no problem with someone holding an opposing viewpoint. When I taught high school almost without exception all my friends and colleges were Liberal Democrats. When it comes to celebrities however, they are paid to entertain not interject their personal politics at nonpolitical events. With her hysterical, stuttering tirade at the Emmy Awards, she joined the likes of Danny Glover, Sean Penn and Charlie Sheen all of whom I was naïve enough to believe had at least a nodding acquaintance with reality. If she truly believes that the world would not have war if it was run by mothers, she is more deluded than the aforementioned triumvirate combined.
She has the right to her opinion as do all Americans. (Unless they have a Conservative opinion in which case they are to be muzzled and ridiculed at all costs) However to come to her erroneous conclusion, she would have to be ignorant of some of the great mothers in history. How about Russia’s Catherine the Great or England’s Queen Victoria, both of whose expansionist wars would rival any man’s. We can’t include Queen Elizabeth I due to her non-mother status as the “Virgin Queen” Or how about the more recent examples of Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir? These two modern mothers were iron willed leaders who led their respective nations into successful campaigns against formidable opponents.
I happen to believe that women are just as capable leaders as men in peace or war. The only problem is that the most prominent female “leaders” in American politics are all well left of center. Whether it’s the scarf wearing, Axis of Evil member Basher Assad cuddling, Sen. Nancy Pelosi or the heavily medicated, second grade schoolteacher sounding drivel of alleged Republican Sen. Susan Collins, there is a serious lack of gravitas exhibited by the current crop of leaders who lack a y chromosome. Hillary? If she can be so easily fooled by George Bush into voting for the Iraq War, how would she fare when pitted against world leaders who truly wish to destroy our way of life?
In the current times in which we live with Al Queda, North Korea, Syria and a revitalized Russia vying for the chance to topple the United States from the sole superpower status, we can ill afford to vote for the next president solely on the basis of gender. However show me a viable conservative, experienced and tested mother and she would get my vote every time.

Vulture Culture

Vulture culture is now a way of life in America. The most obvious example is the Anna Nicole Smith fiasco. Howard K. Stern the lawyer/lover/leech (or am I being redundant?) found the perfect carrion-to-be and has been snacking away happily ever since. Even “sideshow Sidlin”, the judge who is allegedly shopping around for a TV gig pulled out all the stops in getting every range of emotion broadcast to potential producers. This guy makes Judge Ito of O.J. fame look like Supreme Court material. It would not seem out of the range of possibility to imagine the mother may have her sights on some kind of Texas -size Graceland in mind if she wins her daughter’s corpse. Even though she has finally been buried the fight goes on for possession . Possession of the child with the hundred million dollar potential is the new battle.
The vulture culture is predominate in politics as well. The anti-gunners in politics quietly wait in the background until a gun related tragedy occurs. Then they swoop in with ’common sense” measures which tighten the laws on only certain types of weapons or ammunition or even outlets for the “safety of the public”. ( Won’t someone think of the children?) They know that an incremental strangulation of the Second Amendment is more likely to be successful than an outright attack.
The most insidious manifestation of the vulture culture involves the current attempt to pull troops out of Iraq. The Left’s constant screaming tally of fallen soldiers in Iraq is the best tactic they have. Growing up during the Vietnam War I can remember the daily/weekly body count tally on the nightly news. But even during Uncle Walter’s broadcast the number of ENEMY dead was also shown. The number of the dead on the enemy side was always much higher than the US casualties giving some the impression that we must be winning. That kind of thinking will not be tolerated in the majority of newsrooms today In today’s news the only number that matters is the number of Americans that die. If they do give any other number it is the number of Iraqi troops or Iraqi civilians. The impression being that they are the only casualties. The US forces has decided, rightly, to not go into the “body count as a measure of success business “ala Vietnam. The only problem is that the media will rarely if ever report any positive news coming out of Iraq. This leaves the impression that our troops are being pummeled by a rag tag band of fanatics.
The solution? Well the early success of the surge is being under reported so that may be the hint that success is near. The troops need to fight an unfettered war. Taliban massing in a cemetery? Level it! Taking fire from a Mosque? Airstrike! The PC approach that has been employed so far is only prolonging the fight. To fight an enemy that knows no borders you must be willing to attack them where ever they are. Vultures be damned.